<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next keyboard wont feature the QWERTY layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/</link>
	<description>Articles about improving productivity in college through technology, news, and hacks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:57:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brucemagnus</title>
		<link>http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-10138</link>
		<dc:creator>Brucemagnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/#comment-10138</guid>
		<description>I currently use dvorak on my laptop and it didn&#039;t take too long to learn(acceptable typing speed after several days, same speed as qwerty after about a month). I think that as long as you keep using qwerty on other computers, you wont forget it and now I can completely touch type because my keys are still in qwerty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently use dvorak on my laptop and it didn&#8217;t take too long to learn(acceptable typing speed after several days, same speed as qwerty after about a month). I think that as long as you keep using qwerty on other computers, you wont forget it and now I can completely touch type because my keys are still in qwerty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nuorven</title>
		<link>http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nuorven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>Great idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blanda</title>
		<link>http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Blanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 00:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Dvorak is a self promoter?  He was a professor, not the columnist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dvorak is a self promoter?  He was a professor, not the columnist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 00:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>A way to slow them down?!? I&#039;m not saying your wrong, but I&#039;d have to see a few sources to believe that. Dvorak is a big self promoter. Some say the efficiency increase is not so grand.

I changed to DVORAK for a week and only a week. Learning the new layout is not the problem, it&#039;s being able to use QWERTY! One trip to the lab and I found I could barely type up an email. Unless the entire world desides to switch at one, I&#039;m staying with QWERTY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A way to slow them down?!? I&#8217;m not saying your wrong, but I&#8217;d have to see a few sources to believe that. Dvorak is a big self promoter. Some say the efficiency increase is not so grand.</p>
<p>I changed to DVORAK for a week and only a week. Learning the new layout is not the problem, it&#8217;s being able to use QWERTY! One trip to the lab and I found I could barely type up an email. Unless the entire world desides to switch at one, I&#8217;m staying with QWERTY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duh</title>
		<link>http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>duh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenseek.com/collegev2/2006/03/16/the-next-keyboard-wont-feature-the-qwerty-layout/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>There is a reason that QWERTY is the standard in keyboards, maybe not as prevailant today, but back in the day, it was a necessity.

When typewriters were used with the ol&#039; hammering of the letters, keyboards were often in the abcde format, however, because of the time it took to hit a key and have the hammer move down, some of the typing was too fast for the machine, and multilpe hammers would converge on the same location, thus locking things up.  Typerwriter makers needed a way to slow people&#039;s typing down, and thus, qwerty was inveted to force the odd movements of fingers to make normal words.

Interesting eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a reason that QWERTY is the standard in keyboards, maybe not as prevailant today, but back in the day, it was a necessity.</p>
<p>When typewriters were used with the ol&#8217; hammering of the letters, keyboards were often in the abcde format, however, because of the time it took to hit a key and have the hammer move down, some of the typing was too fast for the machine, and multilpe hammers would converge on the same location, thus locking things up.  Typerwriter makers needed a way to slow people&#8217;s typing down, and thus, qwerty was inveted to force the odd movements of fingers to make normal words.</p>
<p>Interesting eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
